Hyena comments on New Year's Predictions Thread (2011) - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Kevin 02 January 2011 09:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (224)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Hyena 02 January 2011 09:22:34PM *  1 point [-]

Next year:

A virus is discovered affecting Android which will create a small crisis in the mobile phone industry: 17%

A minor crisis in rare earth metals will cause an increase in the number of RE mining projects worldwide, judged by starts and investment activity: 15%

.... is caused by Chinese foreign policy, trade restrictions: 65%

.... is caused by an infrastructure disaster in China, natural or man-made: 30%

One of the largest reinsurance companies, top 10, will collapse because of underestimated basis risk: 6%

The New York art scene will be displaced as the center, process started with clear trajectory: 3%

.... resulted from further dilution of the classical collector pool by collectors driven by current prices: 65%

Next 10 years:

Governments of countries with shrinking or stable populations have shifted to using a measure other than GDP as their primary benchmark of economic growth, 80% of shrinking/stable states: 70%

"Hacker" re 'malicious manipulator of other's networks' will be displaced by "hacker" re 'someone involved in DIY projects and soft, fluffy Frauenfelderism': 67%

Peak travel in the US will lead naturally to changes in urban design as people reduce regular travel to increase leisure travel: 53%

Worker retraining programs are developed which focus on putting people with liberal arts degrees on a trajectory to technical master's degrees, functional in at least 3 of the 15 largest US states: 47%

We reach "peak carbon" in the developed world without a coordinated plan to do so, clear plateau in carbon emissions per person: 40%

Comment author: TobyBartels 02 January 2011 10:06:16PM *  2 points [-]

Each second-level "..." prediction is conditioned on the preceding first-level prediction, is that right?

Comment author: Hyena 03 January 2011 05:07:56PM 2 points [-]

Right.

Comment author: simplyeric 06 January 2011 06:27:44PM 0 points [-]

"Peak travel in the US will lead naturally to changes in urban design as people reduce regular travel to increase leisure travel: 53%"

Could you elaborate on this some?

There are various processes underway that are already affecting urban, suburban, and exurban design...some of them are "style" and "trend", some of them are result of the cost:benefit experiment that the last 20-30 yrs of housing development has been (always is, to be fair), some a result of fear or gas prices or the viability of the airline industry.

I'm curious what you see coming out of the interplay of regular travel v. liesure travel...

Comment author: JoshuaZ 03 January 2011 04:10:26AM 0 points [-]

A virus is discovered affecting Android which will create a small crisis in the mobile phone industry: 17%

This percentage seems surprisingly precise. How did you arrive at this number?

Comment author: wedrifid 03 January 2011 04:45:45AM *  6 points [-]

<General and oft repeated expression of disapproval for the cultural insistence that significant figures be used to convey confidence or accuracy. />

Comment author: Hyena 03 January 2011 05:24:31PM 1 point [-]

I'm flattered by some of the speculations lower down. It's not nearly so complex. I basically asked myself a series of questions about each one until I got to a rough idea by tens. The number is then adjusted by 3% or 5% with the former marking "just shy/north of" and the latter "between". If my anxieties, both about the event and not wanting to put direct bias pressure on the number, seem satisfied, I go with it.

Reinsurance got 6% because I thought "a bit more than zero" then "more than that".

Comment author: shokwave 03 January 2011 05:00:42AM *  1 point [-]

One-in-six chance is 16.666..., rounding up is 17%. That's a possibility.

Not all of the other numbers in his post seem to be derived from fractions, though, so not very confident.

Comment author: khafra 03 January 2011 04:30:32AM 0 points [-]

Also seems pretty low--83% certain android on so many platforms is pretty secure?

Comment author: shokwave 03 January 2011 04:43:25AM *  2 points [-]

I doubt Hyena believes that: there are already Android viruses, but none of them have caused a small crisis in the mobile phone industry.

Comment author: Hyena 03 January 2011 05:25:49PM 1 point [-]

Right. I think we might have one sufficiently dangerous or infectious that people actually care.

Comment author: shokwave 03 January 2011 05:35:32PM 0 points [-]

I know of at least one geocaching/wifi exploit to achieve non-GPS locating; a virus using that plus having some use for the phone's location would certainly scare enough people to start a small crisis.