gwern comments on New Year's Predictions Thread (2011) - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Kevin 02 January 2011 09:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (224)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 02 January 2011 02:46:52PM 4 points [-]

General AI will not be made in 2011. Confidence: 90%.

The removal of DADT by the US military will result in fewer than 300 soldiers leaving the military in protest. (Note that this may be hard to measure.) Confidence: 95%.

The Riemann Hypothesis will not be proven. Confidence: 75%. (Minor note for the nitpickers: relevant foundational system is ZFC.)

Ryan Williams recent bound on ACC circuits of NEXP ((See here for a discussion of Williams work)) will be tightened in at least one of three ways: The result will be shown to apply for some smaller set of problems than NEXP, the result will be improved for some broader type of circuit than ACC, or the bound on the circuit size ruled out will be improved. Confidence: 60%

At least one head pastor of a Protestant megachurch in the US will be found to be engaging in homosexual activity. For purposes of this prediction "megachurch" means a church with regular attendance of 3000 people at Sunday services. Confidence: 70%.

Clashes between North Korea and South Korea will result in fatalities: Confidence 80%.

Comment author: gwern 06 January 2011 10:10:38PM 2 points [-]
  1. GAI: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2092
  2. DADT: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2093 (assuming year timescale)
  3. Riemann: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2094
  4. Ryan Williams: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2095 (I, uh, hope you'll be judging that one; I don't follow complexity theory work as closely as you obviously do.)
  5. Sex scandal: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2096
  6. Korea: http://predictionbook.com/predictions/2097 (when judging I assume any unilateral attack counts even if the other side doesn't retaliate, like the Cheonan)
Comment author: JoshuaZ 11 January 2011 04:03:54AM 0 points [-]

Regarding 4, there are a fair number of people here interested in complexity theory issues so it shouldn't be that hard to get people to judge that. Also note that I deliberately made the question more precise by listing three of the more plausible ways the result might be extended rather than just that it would be tightened. That helps make the question clear cut (if it were generalized to anything that could be reasonably construed as a tightening of his result I'd bump the probability up but it would be much trickier to judge the result.)