mendel comments on Counterfactual Mugging - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Vladimir_Nesov 19 March 2009 06:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (258)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AlephNeil 22 May 2011 12:45:01PM *  1 point [-]

Your version of the story discards the most important ingredient: The fact that when you win the coin toss, you only receive money if you would have paid had you lost.

As for Omega, all we know about it is that somehow it can accurately predict your actions. For the purposes of Counterfactual Mugging we may as well regard Omega as a mindless robot which will burn the money you give to it and then self-destruct immediately after the game. (This makes it impossible to pay because you feel obligated to Omega. In fact, the idea is that you pay up because you feel obligated to your counterfactual self.)