= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwern comments on 2011 Intrade fee changes, or, Intrade considered no longer useful for LessWrongers - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (7)
Not that I think that it is impossible for this to be the truth; I just think it unlikely:
(My reasoning for the jump is that a year doesn't suffice to drain the dormant accounts at $60 a year, but two would drain most, and then the shut-down becomes a real possibility; and Intrade seems to've long been a marginal concern independent of any ill effects from this fee change.)
Contracts on "the market ceases to operate and this contract becomes worthless" should be seriously underpriced, no?
(edit: whoops, didn't even look at the links)
Those are PB.com predictions; Intrade.com doesn't have such contracts as far as I know and I certainly wouldn't buy any contracts if they did, the new fees aside.