Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Rationalist Fiction - Less Wrong

27 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 March 2009 08:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (189)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 20 March 2009 08:23:58PM *  17 points [-]

It's interesting that "Watchmen" (in theaters now) is the Hamlet of a genre that is strongly anti-rational, yet has numerous rational elements. The most important, I think, is that the Earth is saved only by inhumanly rational people making rational decisions - rational decisions which the typical viewer cannot condone even after the fact, even knowing that they saved the Earth. In so doing, it proves to these viewers, not just consciously but deep in their gut, that they themselves would doom Earth by their irrationality.

On the other hand, Dr. Manhattan embodies the popular culture's prejudice against rationality perfectly when he explains why he isn't interested in life by saying, "A living body and a dead one contain the same number of atoms". People try to imagine why scientists are interested in little things under microscopes, but not in gossip or football games. They can't imagine that the little things under the microscope are actually more interesting, so they conclude that scientists are cold and boring, and thus unable to see how interesting gossip and football really are.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 11 December 2009 06:51:51AM 8 points [-]

You can't do what the character does, and in the comic it's strongly implied that it didn't work anyway.

Comment deleted 21 December 2009 12:16:39AM [-]
Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 21 December 2009 12:17:14AM 2 points [-]

First.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 21 December 2009 06:23:10PM 4 points [-]

Second!

No, seriously: EY was responding to a question that I asked and then deleted a few seconds later because I figured it out myself. He's fast.