David_Gerard comments on The Neglected Virtue of Scholarship - Less Wrong

177 Post author: lukeprog 05 January 2011 07:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: David_Gerard 05 January 2011 11:24:22PM *  4 points [-]

Also, in the softer fields, it's possible to contribute precisely on account of one's ignorance of what went before, too much knowledge of existing theories' assumptions sometimes standing in the way of real progress.

You haven't noted the most horrible thing about this: that the fields are still valuable, even still necessary. Us being no good at them doesn't change this.

c.f. medicine before germ theory and cell theory.

c.f. postmodernism, which is notoriously BS-ridden, but anyone who aspires to write good fiction needs a working knowledge of postmodernist techniques, whether they call them that or not.

Comment author: bentarm 06 January 2011 01:03:14AM 4 points [-]

anyone who aspires to write good fiction needs a working knowledge of postmodernist techniques, whether they call them that or not

So Poe was an instinctive postmodernist?