ThomasR comments on generalized n-categories? - Less Wrong

0 Post author: ThomasR 08 January 2011 07:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (2)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThomasR 09 January 2011 09:43:32AM 0 points [-]

Not quite so. The n-Lab contains a page on it: http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/hyperstructure , but that is not that new. The usual deficiency of such constructs (and the many attempted definitions of n-categories) is their reliance on set theory. Grothendieck seems to have been the first to suggest to forget set theory as foundations, and Voevodsky's way to build a homotopy-theoretic foundation of mathematics on some sort of computer language (leading to entirely new approaches to artificial theorem proving/checking): http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/hyperstructure may be interesting for Baas' ideas too. Interestingly too, homotopy theory, n-category were caused by attempts to deal with topology, and Baas' concepts come from the same background. He was apparently motivated by Charles Ehresmann's ctitique that n-categories should be insufficient.