Jack comments on A cautionary note about "Bayesianism" - Less Wrong

12 Post author: PhilGoetz 10 January 2011 01:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 12 January 2011 02:03:24AM *  1 point [-]

I say the last except I pronounce the sh a bit like a French J or the 'g' in "mirage". Just like "Cartesian". I've never heard the first. The second I've heard but I don't like as much.

Comment author: ewang 12 January 2011 02:33:54AM 0 points [-]

That's what I was thinking, but I couldn't find a way to properly express the sound.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 12 January 2011 02:41:52AM *  1 point [-]

The most common notation for this seems to be "zh" (since it's a voiced "sh").