Psychohistorian comments on Deontological Decision Theory and The Solution to Morality - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (91)
This is not at all true. The fact that if people acted as I do, there would be no stable equilibrium is largely immaterial, because my actions do not affect how others behave. Unless I value "acting in a way that can be universalized," the fact that I don't do so has no effect on my decision making.
If all I care about is the good grade, and I have no value for personal integrity and whatnot, then if I'm an egoist and only care about myself, I should cheat. Other people are not egoists, and I can take advantage of this. If I am not an egoist and value integrity, or am too risk-averse, I should not cheat. There aren't a lot of genuine egoists out there, so this isn't usually a problem. Most of the ones that do exist tend to be constrained by the risk of punishment in many cases.