cousin_it comments on Does Evidential Decision Theory really fail Solomon's Problem? - Less Wrong

6 Post author: AlexMennen 11 January 2011 04:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: cousin_it 11 January 2011 06:37:32AM *  4 points [-]

I'm not sure what Solomon's Problem means. If I make up a really convincing argument that the king should (or shouldn't) send for another man's wife, and communicate it to the king, am I thus forcing him to "always have been" charismatic or otherwise? How is this conditioning on actions supposed to work? Does adopting a certain decision theory make you retroactively charismatic?

Also I don't understand why the problem is named this way. In the prototypical example from the Bible, king David sends for Uriah's wife Bathsheba, and Solomon is their son. What.

Comment author: SilasBarta 11 January 2011 03:29:39PM 3 points [-]

Also I don't understand why the problem is named this way. In the prototypical example from the Bible, king David sends for Uriah's wife Bathsheba, and Solomon is their son. What.

Well, it's definitely become a problem for Solomon at that point...

Comment author: wedrifid 20 March 2012 06:10:00AM 0 points [-]

Also I don't understand why the problem is named this way. In the prototypical example from the Bible, king David sends for Uriah's wife Bathsheba, and Solomon is their son. What.

And Solomon already had pretty much all the wives to himself from what I recall...