JenniferRM comments on Does Evidential Decision Theory really fail Solomon's Problem? - Less Wrong

6 Post author: AlexMennen 11 January 2011 04:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JenniferRM 11 January 2011 06:53:01PM 0 points [-]

I think the puzzle Rolf was wondering about was the ordering of the steps in between Step 1 "I'm going to start something" and Step N "Approach investor". Do you want "Get co-founder" to be step 2 (before you're even sure what the idea is and who you should be looking for) or step N-1 (when you know a lot more from steps 2, 3, .... N-3, N-2 but still don't know how hard the co-founder step will actually be)?

If it's purely a matter of signaling to the investors then you'd think that later would be OK. If it's a matter of learning something important about yourself then maybe the co-founder step should be earlier so you don't accidentally waste your time on something you weren't cut out for anyway... unless we hypothesize some sort of bozo-curing self-cultivation that could be performed?

And in the meantime, because this is reality rather than a thought experiment, there is the complicating factor of the value of the co-founder in themselves, bringing expertise and more hands and someone to commiserate/celebrate with and so on.

Comment author: benelliott 11 January 2011 06:58:28PM 0 points [-]

In that case searching for a co-founder is useful not only for signalling, but for finding out an unknown fact about your own abilities. Once again, something that all seriously considered decision theories recommend, as there is an indisputable causal link between knowing your own abilities and doing well.