wedrifid comments on Rational Repentance - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Mass_Driver 14 January 2011 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 January 2011 03:10:22AM 2 points [-]

The word you are looking for is 'nice', not 'rational'.

Comment author: scav 17 January 2011 09:24:26AM 0 points [-]

Hmm. I suspect there's a tiny little bias, possibly politically influenced, whereby signalling that you are nice implies signalling that you are irrational: naive, woolly-minded, immature, not aware of how the world really works, whatever.

But it is rational for us to oppose torture because public acceptance of torture is positively correlated with the risk of members of the public being tortured. And who wants that? It is also negatively correlated with careful, dispassionate, and effective investigation of terrorism and other crimes.

I also oppose it because I love my neighbour, an ethical heuristic I would also defend, but it's not to the point in this case.

Comment author: bgaesop 16 January 2011 07:24:52PM 0 points [-]

That was assumed when I said that the person we're describing is a humanist.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 January 2011 10:12:14PM 0 points [-]

I suppose then that the site that your conclusion would apply to would be humanistcommunity.org, not lesswrong. ;)