Konkvistador comments on Rational Repentance - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Mass_Driver 14 January 2011 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 January 2011 06:22:26AM *  3 points [-]

I find the no politics guideline a bit odd. I mean, shouldn't a rational humanist arrive at certain political positions? Why not make those explicit?

Politics is nearly all signalling. Positions that send good signals only occasional overlap with positions that are rational.

Also the other apes will bash my head in with a rock so I really need to seem to be right even if I'm wrong. Being right on politics and the other side being wrong is a matter of life and death.

Comment author: bgaesop 16 January 2011 07:24:17PM *  2 points [-]

Talking about politics may be mostly signaling, but politics itself-that is, the decisions made and policies enacted-is something else that is really, really important.

If you care about the future of humanity and you have examined the evidence, then you should be concerned about global warming. I don't understand how that statement should be any more controversial than being concerned about the Singularity.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 January 2011 03:33:41AM 3 points [-]

Talking about politics may be mostly signaling, but politics itself-that is, the decisions made and policies enacted-is something else that is really, really important.

Then I will get back to you as soon as I have meaningful influence over any policies enacted.

Comment author: bgaesop 17 January 2011 07:46:11PM *  -2 points [-]

Good point. One interesting thing you can do is advocate for or attempt to participate in a revolution: the odds may be very low of succeeding, but the payoff of successfully succeeding could be almost arbitrarily large, and so the expected utility of doing so could be tremendous.