ata comments on Note on Terminology: "Rationality", not "Rationalism" - Less Wrong

28 Post author: Vladimir_Nesov 14 January 2011 09:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ata 14 January 2011 09:49:14PM *  5 points [-]

Agreed.

"Rationality" can also have some bad or incorrect-from-our-perspective connotations — Spock, Ayn Rand, sociopathic CDT-like agents in economic/game-theoretic models, etc. — but at least without the "ism" it doesn't sound like we're pledging our allegiance to an ideology, and we can explain what we mean by it without people saying "But philosophers X, Y, and Z were 'rationalists' and they didn't believe that!"

Comment author: DSimon 19 January 2011 08:11:33PM 0 points [-]

Another first response I tend to get:

"So, if it were rational to kill yourself, would you do it?"

Comment author: TheOtherDave 19 January 2011 09:14:45PM *  3 points [-]

What do you answer?

My honest answer would be "I don't know; I'd like to think so" but I suspect that would fail to communicate usefully.

Perhaps "Well, for example, if by killing myself I could save the lives of ten other people whose lives were roughly as worthwhile as mine, then I'd like to think I would... though of course you never know until the moment for decision arrives. What would you do in that situation?"