JoshuaZ comments on Theists are wrong; is theism? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Will_Newsome 20 January 2011 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (533)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 20 January 2011 03:28:52AM 2 points [-]

If one accepts general Tegmark, is there any natural measure for describing how common different universes should be in any meaningful sense?

Comment author: jimrandomh 20 January 2011 04:00:47AM 2 points [-]

Yes, but unfortunately, there are many measures to choose from, and you can't possibly tell which is correct until you've visited Permutation City and at least a dozen of its suburbs.

Comment author: Perplexed 20 January 2011 03:47:21AM 1 point [-]

I agree with the question. It may make sense to attach "probabilities of existing" to universes arising in a chaotic inflation model, but not, I think, in an "ultimate ensemble" multiverse, which seems to be the one being examined here.

But, to be honest, I had never even considered the possibility that a particularly large bubble universe might contain a simulation of a much smaller bubble. Inflation, as I understand it, does make it possible for a simulation of one small piece of physical reality to encompass an entire isolated 'universe'.

Comment author: ata 20 January 2011 03:37:28AM *  1 point [-]

Not yet, as far as I know. Big World cosmology seems to be going in the right direction, but it's not yet understood well enough that we should be coming to any epistemological or ethical conclusions based on it.