lukeprog comments on Theists are wrong; is theism? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Will_Newsome 20 January 2011 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (533)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lukeprog 20 January 2011 07:05:54AM 2 points [-]

gwern,

Plantinga's Free Will Defense is not an argument for theism. The conclusion of the free will argument is that it is not logically impossible for God and evil to co-exist. That is an extremely modest conclusion on the part of the theist.

Comment author: gwern 20 January 2011 02:24:49PM 0 points [-]

We observe a lack of evidence of contradictions in the concept of god; and absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

Of course the FWD increases our probability for God if we accept it; what else could it possibly do, decrease it? The most charitable interpretation I can put on your comment is that you are confusedly saying 'yes, but it doesn't increase it by much' when I'm pointing out that 'it increases by some non-zero amount, however modest that amount may be'.

Comment author: lukeprog 20 January 2011 09:34:28PM 1 point [-]

Okay, I see what you mean. Thanks for clarifying!