Didn't we have this conversation already?

That was a different conversation, though the same theme of using words incorrectly also came up, if that's what you mean.

There is no good reason to misuse words in this way, just state clearly what you intended to say (e.g. as komponisto suggested).

There are good reasons to do so among people who share the same language, like me and some SIAI folk. It makes communication faster, and makes it easier to see single step implications. Being precise has large consequences for brains that run largely on single step insights from cached knowledge. I agree that in the case of this post my choice of language was flat out wrong, though.

As it is, you are initiating an argument about definitions,

Arguments about definitions are very important! Choosing a language where it's easier to see implications is important for bounded agents. That said, it wasn't what I was trying to do with this post, and you're right that it would have been a totally lost cause if that's what I was trying to do.