Zack_M_Davis comments on Theists are wrong; is theism? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Will_Newsome 20 January 2011 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (533)
Tags: antitheism atheism contrarianism philosophy religion singularity

Comments (533)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Zack_M_Davis 20 January 2011 08:22:10PM 9 points [-]

I get a lot of glee out of meta-contrarianism and talking in a way that would make stereotypical aspiring rationalists think I was crazy

I agree that verbal masturbation is fun, but it's not helpful when you're tying to actually communicate with people. Consider purchasing contrarian glee and communication separately.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 20 January 2011 08:26:32PM 1 point [-]

I agree, though I was describing the case where I can do both simultaneously (when I'm talking to people who either don't mind or join in on the fun). This post was more an example of just not realizing that the use of the word 'theism' would have such negative and distracting connotations.

Comment author: steven0461 20 January 2011 09:05:47PM *  1 point [-]

That's a good point, but where do you recommend getting contrarian glee separate from communication?

Comment author: Document 20 January 2011 09:36:11PM *  2 points [-]

Cached thoughts: Crackpot Theory (48 readers)? Closet Survey, The Strangest Thing An AI Could Tell You, The Irrationality Game? Omegle?

Comment author: steven0461 20 January 2011 10:31:03PM 8 points [-]

I wish crackpot theories were considered a legitimate form of art. They're like fantasy worldbuilding but better.

Comment author: anon895 24 January 2011 12:06:26AM 2 points [-]

Here, of course.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit