wnewman comments on Science: Do It Yourself - Less Wrong

53 Post author: alyssavance 13 February 2011 04:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (205)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 17 February 2011 07:01:48PM 1 point [-]

Who do the chess and bridge players play bridge and chess with if they don't have friends?

Comment author: wnewman 17 February 2011 07:45:09PM 1 point [-]

Of course there could well be some exaggeration for dramatic effect there --- as David Friedman likes to say, one should be skeptical of any account which might survive on its literary or entertainment value alone. But it's not any sort of logical impossibility. In Dallas near UTD (which had a strong well-funded chess team which contributed some of the strong coffeehouse players) ca. 2002 I was able to play dozens of coffeehouse games against strangers and casual acquaintances. One can also play in tournaments and in open-to-all clubs. Perhaps one could even play grudge matches against people one dislikes. Also today one can play an enormous number of strangers online, and even in the 1970s people played postal chess.

Comment author: MichaelVassar 19 February 2011 06:24:29PM 0 points [-]

I didn't mention bridge because I think of it as a game people take up later in life and transfer skills to, not as a game people learn as kids and transfer skills from. I could easily be wrong about this.