SoullessAutomaton comments on Just a reminder: Scientists are, technically, people. - Less Wrong

6 Post author: PhilGoetz 20 March 2009 08:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 21 March 2009 02:49:48AM 3 points [-]

Do you think that personhood is really an 'empirical fact'? How would you empirically measure when a developing fetus or infant's (or toddler's, depending on your view of personhood) brain becomes a person without a value-laden definition? Likewise for temporary or permanent brain damage.

Is personhood really a binary proposition at all, or a matter of degree?

Of course, for almost any non-incoherent definition of personhood, the degree of personhood during the first trimester is roughly nil.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 21 March 2009 04:21:31PM 3 points [-]

We need laws that incorporate continuous functions.