thomblake comments on Just a reminder: Scientists are, technically, people. - Less Wrong

6 Post author: PhilGoetz 20 March 2009 08:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 24 March 2009 03:45:52PM 2 points [-]

the slightly-more-elitist framework of representative democracy that the US founders intended

The US founders intended several different, opposing things. Some were much more elitist than others.

Representative democracy is not designed to follow values representative of the population.

That's an open question. Some prefer representative democracy because it lets ordinary people spend time on things other than politics - in which case one might still prefer to elect people who would most likely have made the same decision as you would, and oust them when they do something you wouldn't have done.

Comment author: Annoyance 24 March 2009 04:34:39PM 1 point [-]

Representative democracy doesn't necessarily diverge from the general populace, but it can.

A strong case can be made that this feature is a large part of why it was chosen by the Founders in the first place. Even if it wasn't, it clearly permits forms of elitism that other systems would rule out immediately. This fact is significant even if it wasn't intended.