= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jack comments on Gettier in Zombie World - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (22)
Like others said this needs to either focus on Zombies or Gettier- maybe focus on Gettier first and then used that as a tool to address Chalmers. I would just take out the notes to newcomers. Despite the length of this post it still feels rushed to me- the ideas you're dealing are pretty complex and you just keep piling one on top of the other. This makes it hard to follow even for someone familiar with a lot of those concepts.
I have a bit to say about the content but I'm going to make that another comment.
I can see parts that I could reasonably cut or break off. But I really want a chance of convincing some philosophers, so I have to address the points in the notes somehow. Perhaps in actual footnotes?
Do you plan to wait and address the content after I fix that?
As someone inferentially closer to philosophers than most people here I don't think the 'notes for newcomers' section is particularly essential to this endeavor. But the main thing is- this looks like a 15-20 page argument you've condensed to 4. So what you need to do is either forgo this medium and just write a full paper or break down the argument into sections that can be posted separately.
Nah, I just got confused and then distracted and then moved on. I'll try to do it now. Feel free to harangue me if I don't.