Nah, that doesn't look very convincing. The whole point of CM was that once a branch of you gets asked for $100, agreeing to pay cannot benefit that branch. Also, what Emile said.
Convincing schmonvincing. All I promised is that all strategies will do equally well.
This is equivalent to Newcomb's Problem in the sense that any strategy does equally well on both, where by "strategy" I mean a mapping from info to (probability distributions over) actions.
I suspect that any problem with Omega can be transformed into an equivalent problem with amnesia instead of Omega.
Does CDT return the winning answer in such transformed problems?
Discuss.