timtyler comments on $295 bounty for new Singularity Institute logo design (crowd-sourced competition) - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Louie 28 January 2011 06:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (91)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 31 January 2011 08:51:07PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: false_vacuum 02 February 2011 06:22:43PM 0 points [-]

So, I haven't read that paper by Krauss et al. that you suggest, but they and you seem to be saying that the event horizon must have some special local properties, which seems implausible to me. The event horizon is just a perfectly normal region of spacetime which happens to be such that trajectories on one side of the region will never leave its interior. We could already be inside the event horizon of a black hole, and there would be no way to know it. It seems wrong to consider event horizons to be boundaries of the Universe/Reality. Perhaps I am missing something, and I will look into these arguments in more detail at some point. I am very interested in this kind of thing, and in particular questions of discreteness and infinities in physics (but I cannot yet claim to be an expert).

Comment author: timtyler 02 February 2011 09:57:16PM 0 points [-]

Am inclined to say: "but that's why it's called an event horizon."