ata comments on Punishing future crimes - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Bongo 28 January 2011 09:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ata 28 January 2011 11:54:22PM 11 points [-]

If it appears to be happening "for no reason", most people will infer a much more plausible causal explanation than time-traveling punishment — for instance, that this type of hardship contributes to people becoming criminals.

Comment author: Dorikka 29 January 2011 01:20:26AM 7 points [-]

Upvoted. If my wallet is stolen, there has got to be an amazing amount of evidence before the hypothesis 'a time traveler is punishing me for future crimes' would even enter my consciousness. I think that this actually might have an Occam prior low enough that I should start seriously doubting my own sanity before I assign a significant probability to it.

Comment author: Bongo 29 January 2011 01:20:41AM *  1 point [-]

Of course it wouldn't be time travel. People who were especially good at predicting other people's life paths would just do so and punish accordingly, or something.

Edit: I accept your point that future consequences don't suffice to justify time-travelling punishment.

Comment author: Broggly 31 January 2011 06:49:35PM 0 points [-]

Wasn't there some Twilight Zone episode about this, where a Jewish time traveller used a mind-control device to torment Hitler, which caused his anti-semitism?