lukstafi comments on Counterfactual Calculation and Observational Knowledge - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Vladimir_Nesov 31 January 2011 04:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (183)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lukstafi 31 January 2011 07:53:18PM *  0 points [-]

You can't conclude this - think about what evidence you have that the calculator is in error!

You can't conclude this, but for a different reason: changing the value on the display means changing Omega. You cannot have the same Omega and a different value of the same process. (ETA: and calling the name of Everett does not affect my reasoning here ETA2 meaning that I don't think Q is most likely even in the counterfactual universe.)