bentarm comments on Starting a LW meet-up is easy. - Less Wrong

39 Post author: AnnaSalamon 01 February 2011 04:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: bentarm 03 February 2011 01:56:56PM 1 point [-]

I'm almost certain this post will be useful, in that it will result in there being more LW meet-ups than there would otherwise have been. But, seriously, did anyone actually need the cotents? In order to arrange to meet some people who frequent a website you visit regularly, post something to the website saying that you'd like to meet them and where and when.

I'm genuinely curious as to why this will help (as I said, I'm sure it will). Is it because it explicitly gives people "permission" to go ahead and organise their own meet-up? Again, there can't possibly be any information in the post that any regular LW reader couldn't figure out for themselves.

Comment author: VManuel 23 June 2011 09:43:30PM 1 point [-]

Human nature dictates that we both assume 'someone else' is going to start a group, and assume the task of creating said group is very difficult. So even those people who lurk and say to themselves, "Gosh, I'd love to have a group like that in my city" won't take the first step unless they are given "permission".

In that sentence, you really did hit the nail on the head there, Bentarm.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 03 February 2011 02:27:03PM 8 points [-]

It might be implicitly providing the information that there isn't anything else that needs to be known/done to successfully conduct such a meetup, which is hard to be certain about.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 11 February 2011 07:10:50PM 1 point [-]

I'll explicitly say "yes, that's exactly the main key thing I got from it."

Comment author: Curiouskid 09 December 2011 12:41:46AM 0 points [-]

Agreed. Knowing about "unknown unknowns" is very important.

Comment author: Kevin 11 February 2011 07:42:45PM 0 points [-]

Let's call it trivial uncertainty