= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
wedrifid comments on You're in Newcomb's Box - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (172)
Rationalists should win.
In this scenario two-boxers get 200$ and exist, while one-boxers get 100$ and exist.
Two-boxers will be numerically fewer, because Prometheus is biased in favour of irrationality, but nonetheless it'll be two-boxers that'll be winning. That's the opposite of two-boxers in the Newcomb problem.
That is brilliant. Did you create it manually?
Thanks, I did. I'm sure there are generators for it, though.