Take off every 'quote'! You know what you doing. For great insight. Move 'quote'.
And if you don't:
Please post all quotes separately, so that they can be voted up/down separately. (If they are strongly related, reply to your own comments. If strongly ordered, then go ahead and post them together.)
Do not quote yourself.
Do not quote comments/posts from LW. (If you want to exclude OB too create your own quotes thread! OB is entertaining and insightful and all but it is no rationality blog!)
No more than 5 quotes per person per monthly thread, please.
That may be good advice for most people. (Or maybe not.) But me, I'm a chronic floccinaucinihilipilificationist. (It's one of my more endearing traits.) And no, I don't use a spellchecker. I don' need no steenkeeng spellchecker.
And if you mis-spell too much, or worse use the wrong word (which is increasingly common with spell-checking), you waste any readers' time trying to figure out what you are trying to say.
10Wei Dai
That's true if the only benefit of proofreading is finding misspellings. But you should be proofreading to find errors of expression in general, and the optimal amount of proofreading for that may imply that you find and fix all misspellings.
Take off every 'quote'! You know what you doing. For great insight. Move 'quote'.
And if you don't: