Perplexed comments on Convergence Theories of Meta-Ethics - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Perplexed 07 February 2011 09:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 09 February 2011 04:55:56AM 0 points [-]

Poor choice of wording on my part. I meant to say that comparing moralities is one of the things that meta-ethics covers; that if you are engaged in comparing moralities, you are doing meta-ethics. Is this wrong?

I think it is. Comparing moralities is part of morality. ...

Hmmm. I think you are right. At the risk of appearing really ridiculous, I now have to admit that I used poor wording in my confession above that I had used poor wording. What I really should have said is that if you are discussing the criteria that AIs might use in comparing moralities, as I did in the OP, then you are doing meta-ethics.

Is this wrong too?