PhilGoetz comments on Value Stability and Aggregation - Less Wrong

8 Post author: jimrandomh 06 February 2011 06:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 07 February 2011 02:03:07AM *  4 points [-]

HapMax seemed like a good idea at first, but this example shows that it is very wrong.

I'm familiar with the Nozick utility monster. Convince me that the monster is wrong, instead of saying "it's obvious". Is there no utility level the monster could have that would justify giving it all resources? That seems very odd to me.

If there are 2 people in a space capsule that will take 1 day to reach Earth, and only enough oxygen for one person to live one day, would you have them both die? If not, how is that different?