My guess is that you would be bothered by the following passage:

Actually, no, since the language isn't gender-specific. I'm still not convinced by the theory, but I don't find the terminology nearly as objectionable when it's applied to people in general rather than women in particular.

I understand your frustration with overbroad generalizations about women's preferences, and the use of evolutionary theories in the absence of empirical studies.

Awesome. I agree with your point about not generalizing overmuch from my own experiences, either. And I don't hold a strong position against all evopsych. So as far as the basic groundwork here goes, we are in agreement.