I'm not particularly inclined towards a charitable interpretation of arguments written by Andrew Schafly. In my own short time frequenting the site, I found him rendering judgments on others' work based on the premise that

"No facts conflict with conservative ideology

therefore, anything which conflicts with conservative ideology is not a fact."

If you try to interpret his views in the most reasonable light you can, you probably haven't understood him. He's a living embodiment of Poe's Law