Vladimir_M comments on Some Heuristics for Evaluating the Soundness of the Academic Mainstream in Unfamiliar Fields - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (272)
JGWeissman:
I don't see how this objection is specific to sensitive topics. Assuming that regular participants maintain high enough standards, incompetent attempts by newbies to comment on sensitive topics should be effectively discouraged by downvoting, as in all other debates. Even in the most innocent technical discussions, things will go downhill if there is no mechanism in place to discourage unproductive and poorly thought out comments. In either case, if the voting system is ineffective, it means that more stringent moderation is in order.
On the other hand, if even the behavior of regular participants is problematic, then we get back to the problems I was writing about.
In innocent technical discussions, users will generally base their votes only on the merits of the comments they're voting on. In sensitive political discussions, some will vote based on ideological agreement.
A problem common to both cases is that LessWrong is hesitant to vote anything down below zero, possibly for good morale-related reasons.