Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on You're Calling *Who* A Cult Leader? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (112)
Point taken. But that example isn't generic status competition, it's role competition. Are so many people calling PG a cult leader really in role competition with him? For what? Are there so many commenters at this site in role competition with me? I think you have a valid point here about a factor that would make admiration directed at another seem bad, but can it plausibly be that particular factor which is at work here?
(Edited to make clear the difference between status competition and role competition.)
They're socially engaged with him and his web community. Status competition doesn't have to mean preparation for direct overthrow, it can also mean efforts to reduce the size of status gaps relative to current superiors. Demonstrating or admitting inferiority to someone in the immediate social hierarchy pushes the low lower, while successfully tearing down a superior raises the tearer while lowering the torn, even if only marginally.
Great point, and I think that the "competition", if there is competition, isn't with PG or EY but with everyone else.
There is an essay about this by Pavel Curtis, creator of LambdaMOO - he would frequently find that newcomers would respond to his perceived status by being exaggeratedly rude to his character, showing off that they were prepared to stand up to the Man, so long as of course they could do it in perfect safety under the cover of anonymity.
Found it: Mudding: Social Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Realities
'Exagerrated rudeness' could also be a product of the greater internet dickwad theory.
Attitudes toward MUD wiz teams are also part politics, since the leaders are often dictators of the local environment.