David_Gerard comments on Is Morality a Valid Preference? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: MinibearRex 21 February 2011 01:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (75)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 February 2011 09:23:14PM 0 points [-]

We are in violent agreement (but I'm coming off worse!).

rstarkov suggested that people may have "utility functions" that don't take real values.

Endoself's comment "showed" that this cannot be, starting from the assumption that everybody has a preference system that can be encoded as a real-valued utility function. This is nonsense.

My non-disagreement with you seems to have stemmed from me not wanting to be the first person to say "order-type", and us making different assumptions about how various poster's positions projected onto our own internal models of "lists" (whatever they were).

Comment author: FAWS 24 February 2011 11:02:10PM 0 points [-]

You shouldn't have used the worlds "not relevant", that implied the statement had no important implications for the problem at all, rather than proving the (very relevant since the topic is ulilitarism) hidden assumption wrong for that set of people (unless they bit the bullet).