Perplexed comments on Dawkins and Dennett defend Adaptationism [Links] - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Perplexed 23 February 2011 04:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 23 February 2011 03:08:22PM *  2 points [-]

... whether somehow 'constraints' and genetic drift can funnel the progress of evolution towards complex ("designed-looking") characteristics that confer no adaptive advantage.

(To me, [that] still seems weird and unmotivated, though I'm not ideologically wedded to it being wrong.)

I suppose the epistemological point that Lewontin would harp on here is that if you go in expecting Nature to only do things that seem well-motivated and 'natural', then you are going to produce ideologically biased science.

But as to whether evolution can produce complex 'designed-looking' characteristics that are not positively adaptive, give a look to this single-topic blog by Arlin Stoltzfus and this paper discussing an idea known as Constructive Neutral Evolution (pdf).