Vaniver comments on Wikipedia: Moravec's Paradox - Less Wrong

16 Post author: cousin_it 28 February 2011 02:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 02 March 2011 06:42:03AM 0 points [-]

Finding statistical relationships between large numbers of concepts and sensory inputs just doesn't scale well compared to doing a bunch of calculus to predict an control movement of the body.

Really? Correlation is just multiplying and adding, which both scale well and parallelize trivially. Scaling the calculus required to control pendulums is far less pretty- going from 1 to 2 makes the problem chaotic, and I imagine 3 is even less pretty. This looks like a common problem to give students, so the double pendulum can't be that difficult. My feeling, though, is that the toughest solved sensorimotor problems are a lot 'easier' than the toughest solved machine learning problems.