Vladimir_M comments on Singularity Institute now accepts donations via Bitcoin - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Kevin 28 February 2011 04:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (100)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 07 March 2011 03:11:34AM *  3 points [-]

There's actually a whole lot of significance in being endorsed by a respectable institution. As several other people have remarked in this thread, if the feds decide to throw the book at you, you're screwed no matter what. The only way to immunize yourself against this threat is to have backing by high-status people who are able to sway the public opinion and the legal establishment in your favor (so the feds will get bad press instead of accolades if they attack you, and you have a good chance to persuade a court to order the feds to leave you alone). EFF is far from being a decisively powerful player in this regard, but getting its endorsement is definitely a large step in the direction favorable for the Bitcoin people.

Comment author: SilasBarta 07 March 2011 01:41:38PM 2 points [-]

Again, I agree there are benefits, I just dispute their characterization by Wei_Dai et al. EFF is not "endorsing" Bitcoin in the sense usually meant; they're saying they'll accept donations that way. There's a huge difference between that and "Oh, but these respectable lawyer guys told this big organization it'd be okay!"

Anyway, I did join up. If you look at the map of users, I'm the singular dude in Waco.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 08 March 2011 02:04:06AM *  4 points [-]

EFF is not "endorsing" Bitcoin in the sense usually meant; they're saying they'll accept donations that way.

The Activism Director of EFF wrote a substantial blog post on Bitcoin, calling it "a step toward censorship-resistant digital currency". Earlier, they had another post listing Bitcoin as a project that "digital activists" should contribute to.

ETA: Even without these explicit endorsements, it seems obvious to me that a prominent activism/lobbying/legal organization does not just do something like accept donations in Bitcoin without considering what kind of signal that sends.