wedrifid comments on Rationality Quotes: March 2011 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Alexandros 02 March 2011 11:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (383)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 March 2011 01:05:54AM *  3 points [-]

It's good to understand the player's actions as being part of a particular game. But it's okay to punish the player, if you're feeling altruistic or vengeful enough (that is, you want to do your part to discourage people from playing that game).

It is similarly okay for the player or, indeed, a third party to consider your 'altruistic' punishment to be itself blameworthy or anti-social and subject it to punishment. After all, encouraging 'altruists' to punish the kind of player who is not powerful enough to deter punishment is typically just another part of the game, one step up in sophistication.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 03 March 2011 07:59:41PM 6 points [-]

You're right. We punish the weak. The piling-on effect I see sometimes sickens me; once someone is already roundly criticized, all sorts of cheap moral-enforcement-altruism-signalers latch on.

Comment author: benelliott 04 March 2011 08:46:29AM *  7 points [-]

Just like how wedrifid begin criticising people like that, and then you joined in. :P

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 06 March 2011 08:16:51AM 0 points [-]

I definitely didn't consider that my comment was so self-describing :) Clever.

I guess I could stand to implement a final "how will this be perceived" habit (pretend I'm the observer reading what some other man has written).