hyporational comments on How I Lost 100 Pounds Using TDT - Less Wrong

70 Post author: Zvi 14 March 2011 03:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (242)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hyporational 28 December 2013 09:31:14PM 0 points [-]

A caloric deficit of more than 25% is considered very dangerous

Is the caloric deficit inherently dangerous or is it that people usually cut the wrong things from their diet? Do you think there are significant dangers to an otherwise healthy person who gets all the micronutrients they need during the deficit and does it only for a month or two?

Comment author: Psychosmurf 29 December 2013 02:33:23AM 0 points [-]

Yes, an extreme caloric deficit would be dangerous to anybody. If the body can't make up the difference between the energy expended and energy eaten by burning fat, it will go into starvation mode, slow down, start eating muscle mass and eventually the internal organs.

Comment author: hyporational 29 December 2013 05:25:06AM *  0 points [-]

I'm not sure I understand why the body would eat internal organs on a two month diet when there's plenty of fat and muscle to burn, or why losing some muscle mass would be dangerous.

Comment author: Psychosmurf 29 December 2013 05:24:30PM 0 points [-]

The heart is made of muscle tissue, and the digestive system is lined with it.

Comment author: hyporational 29 December 2013 08:52:54PM *  0 points [-]

Yeah, smooth muscle and heart muscle, different kinds of tissues from skeletal muscle. I doubt the body has trouble differentiating them.

Comment author: Psychosmurf 29 December 2013 09:10:21PM -1 points [-]

Look, dude. I'm not a doctor, and I can't really tell you what exactly happens to your body if you have an extreme calorie deficit. Nonetheless, every medical professional will tell you that you shouldn't do it.