Curator comments on How to Be Happy - Less Wrong

129 Post author: lukeprog 17 March 2011 07:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (201)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Curator 17 March 2011 09:13:22PM 0 points [-]

Along these lines, don't the studies in your (OP's) Note 16 (to the effect that happiness is largely heritable and "unmoved by external factors") suggest that efforts to improve happiness are largely futile?

From the Lykken & Tellegen study:

"Happiness or subjective wellbeing was measured on a birth-record based sample of several thousand middle-aged twins using the Well Being (WB) scale of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ). Neither socioeconomic status (SES), educational attainment, family income, marital status, nor an indicant of religious commitment could account for more than about 3% of the variance in WB. From 44% to 53% of the variance in WB, however, is associated with genetic variation. Based on the retest of smaller samples of twins after intervals of 4.5 and 10 years, we estimate that <b>the heritability of the stable component of subjective wellbeing approaches 80%.</b>" (Emphasis mine)

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 20 March 2011 06:28:35PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: torekp 19 March 2011 09:07:37PM *  0 points [-]

Genes might explain the variation in well being via behavioral or attitudinal effects. Since lukeprog's recommendations largely concern ways to modify our behavior and attitudes, there is no inherent contradiction with the genetic research. Behavior and attitudes might be crucial even if heritability % were in the high 90s.

By the way, for formatting help on lesswrong, click on the help button at the bottom-right of the comment box.