jimrandomh comments on Being a teacher - Less Wrong

51 Post author: Swimmer963 14 March 2011 08:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (152)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 16 March 2011 01:30:28PM 5 points [-]

Learned to program at five.

Out of curiosity, how far down that road did you go? As far as I know you've never given any public indication of how well you can program (which is emphatically nonbinary), but some people seem to think it's important. (I realize that programming skill is notoriously difficult to measure, but a crude approximation, such as log-lines-written, would be sufficient.)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 March 2011 04:41:00PM 1 point [-]

Log-lines-written? Probably around 5.

Comment author: cousin_it 17 March 2011 01:21:52PM *  3 points [-]

100000 lines? Woah. Where are they all? You didn't program for money or contribute to open source projects, right?

Comment author: jimrandomh 17 March 2011 08:14:03PM *  6 points [-]

100k lines sounds like a lot, but it isn't, especially considering the reduced concept-density of both older languages and novice programmers. My first 100k lines were unpublishable.

Comment author: faul_sname 07 December 2012 08:26:22PM 2 points [-]

100000 lines is probably an underestimate. Doing a line count on all the files in my development directory, I find that I've got about 35000 lines of code in there, and I still consider myself somewhat of an amateur (I've been coding for about a year now). I code probably five hours a week or so, so a full-time programmer with similar productivity who had been programming for a decade would have written 2.8 million lines of code.

100000 lines sounds like a lot, but it's really not.

Comment author: wnoise 17 March 2011 06:30:39PM 0 points [-]

Huh. I was assuming the natural base, e.

Comment author: cousin_it 17 March 2011 07:17:01PM *  6 points [-]

I considered that possibility and disregarded it because exp(5) ~ 148, which is way too low.