= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
wedrifid comments on The Friendly AI Game - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (170)
Yes, that would be preferable. But only because I assert a correlation between the attributes that produce what we measure as g and with personality traits and actual underlying preferences. A superintelligence extrapolating on <the smart people>'s preferences would, in fact, produce a different outcome than one extrapolating on <the rest>.
ArisKataris's accusation that you don't understand CEV means misses the mark. You can understand CEV and still not conclude that CEV<humanity> is necessarily a good thing.