= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
XFrequentist comments on Less Wrong NYC: Case Study of a Successful Rationalist Chapter - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (166)
He means that it is easy for discussion of pick-up / seduction to alienate potential female LW participants.
Aside from advocating the theft of the PUAs' group structure and ethic of practice, my article had nothing to do with seduction.
I thought Cosmos might be making a more complicated point, but fair enough.
Fair enough.
When I wrote grandparent BTW I was not aware you were the author of the (very fine IMHO) article at the far end of the link. I thought you were just mystified as to what the sentence might mean.
Anyway, he removed the link to your article from his article, so I am going to assume that there is no need for me to say more.