gwern comments on Rationality Boot Camp - Less Wrong

73 Post author: Jasen 22 March 2011 08:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (197)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 02 April 2011 01:24:19PM 0 points [-]

That would be much better. 22 years can make a huge difference. (Imagine discussing flaws in the Internet in 1982 versus 1960.)

Comment author: wedrifid 02 April 2011 02:47:10PM 1 point [-]

That would be much better. 22 years can make a huge difference. (Imagine discussing flaws in the Internet in 1982 versus 1960.)

Allowing, of course, that another hundred years has made a difference in just how huge a difference 22 years can represent!

Comment author: brazil84 02 April 2011 05:41:43PM 0 points [-]

Ok, so the exercise will be to design a safe nuclear reactor using only information and knowledge available in 1920.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 02 April 2011 08:10:43PM 3 points [-]

The scariest thing (abstractly speaking) about the situation in Japan is that the early reactors were sited before people knew very much about plate tectonics. What are other important unknown unknowns about other things we're doing?

Comment author: brazil84 03 April 2011 09:40:26AM 0 points [-]

And what is the likelihood that there exist important unknown unknowns?

In 1920, could anyone have known that one of the key aspects of nuclear power plant design was that you need a very reliable backup cooling system?

Could they have at least assessed the probability that they were not considering something important?