GabrielDuquette comments on Folk theories can be useful even when they're entirely wrong - Less Wrong

16 Post author: taw 23 March 2011 04:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 March 2011 08:54:11PM 2 points [-]

I like what Scott Atran has to say about this:

"By way of comparison, if you were to ask a physics class to construct a model of where a soccer ball will land after it has been kicked, the best class would give some very complex but only roughly accurate calculation (based on the leg's arc, the foot's position relative to the ball, the ball's size, weight, initial velocity and spin, gravity and drag, wind speed at the time, etc.). But were you to ask players on a soccer team, they'd likely tell you to just "keep your eye on the ball," meaning pay attention only to the ball's distance and angle relative to the observer. Can you bet which is the better predictor under the time constraints of a real match, the physics class or the soccer team?"

The rest here:

http://www.edge.org/discourse/bb.html#atran2