MinibearRex comments on Crime and punishment - Less Wrong

39 Post author: PhilGoetz 24 March 2011 09:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (189)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MinibearRex 27 March 2011 05:34:47PM 3 points [-]

He's suggesting that working someplace where part of the job description is scanning people's brains would be likely to increase your chances of being scanned yourself, since it would probably be required as part of a job interview. Of course, if the people operating the scanning machine were already psychopaths...

On another note, do psychopaths know that they're psychopaths? My (admittedly very limited) understanding is that they tend to believe that they are normal, and that everyone else is simply pretending to be good, the same way they are. There are some obvious flaws with this reasoning, but the vast majority of psychopaths probably don't have much training in rationality.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 March 2011 05:49:11PM 3 points [-]

He's suggesting that working someplace where part of the job description is scanning people's brains would be likely to increase your chances of being scanned yourself, since it would probably be required as part of a job interview.

I think I've fallen in love with my scenario, but I'm going to run with it anyway.

People in charge typically aren't tested. CEOs can do much more damage than bus drivers, but it's the latter who get drug-tested.

I was thinking of psychopaths targeting being in charge of the project from the beginning, but you're probably right that most of them aren't that self-aware.

On the other hand, you only need one. In fact, that would work better for that psychopath's self-interest than if a number of them were competing for the spot.

Obvious bias: I read Slan at an impressionable age.