NancyLebovitz comments on The trouble with teamwork - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Swimmer963 23 March 2011 06:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Morendil 23 March 2011 08:42:04PM 8 points [-]

I’m more invested in the outcome than the others (...) I skimmed the email and put it aside for later, since it seemed less than urgent to me.

Notice a contradiction?

To a reasonable first approximation teamwork consist of exchanging and fulfilling promises. (To a first approximation only; in particular, affect turns out to count for a lot, but more over the long run.)

See this article for an introduction to one framework for thinking about promises, inspired by the work of Fernando Flores and Terry "SHRDLU" Winograd, and by Searle's theory of speech acts.

The situation you describe can easily be analyzed in terms of failure to negotiate a reliable promise - consider the specific details "an exercise for the reader". The failure isn't necessarily on your part - but one major point of the article is that reliable promises are a shared responsibility.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 23 March 2011 11:00:10PM 0 points [-]

That link on securing reliable promises looks excellent-- that is, it looks much more thorough than my ideas on the subject and there was nothing obviously wrong with it. I admit I haven't poked it hard to check for errors.