emic-and-etic comments on Faith and theory - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
It's pretty plain that when people say they believe in something they don't neccersarily see it before them or in the past - nobody bothers to say I believe in dogs, for example, but are super keen to say they believe in gods - which they probably haven't seen.
Wikipedia parses the meaning of belief into 2 categories. Not that categorisation can neccersarily be defended in any meaingful way until it because ''incorporated by obliteration '' into scientific literature.
'
''